the operational period. Li’c,tle
or no “bilateral.
planning and ccmrdinating activity was accomplished with CTG 7.2 whi,ch led to
taim
mmrh
a
cer~
of confusion in the initial stage of responsibility turn-
over.
2s. The consolidated mess functioned well in consideration of
available facilities but was not able tc handle efficiently the peak
I
load of 36OO with its present maximum seating capacity of 800.
26. All personnel onEN13u~TOK Island were adequately billeted
though inaccurate pre-plmning fi~wes were submitted and a great
deal cf subsequent space shifting was necessary aftxr all personnel
arrived. One task grow~~requested, and received, officer space into
which they placed enlisted persmnel.
Another task group required
much mm-e space than requested2’7. Intersemice friction amcng Air Force and Army mess personnel ymduced
recurrent disciplinaryproblemg. This was traceclto
the Air Force system of assigning permanent l<PIswhose efficiency~
morale and good humor dissclved snmewhat after spending several
months on this
unfavorable detail.
128