The general procedure was to have the patient brought to the local doctor's office. If necessary, off-site monitors provided the transportation. There both doctors examined the patient and arrived at a decision. Any costs were billed through Reynolds Electrical & Engineering, Inc. ‘In no case, of those examined, were there symptoms that could be definitely attributed to radiation injury. Many cases turned out to be some common ailment, diaper rash, in one case. However, the reports of eye irritation were so persistent that this matter should be investigated in order to prove or refute the widespread belief that this is due to test activities. "Reports of injury to livestock were reported by zone personnel and investigated during the series by veterinarians (Mag. Grant ‘Kuhn and Col. Bernard Trum) from the ARC-University of Tennessee Agricul- tural Farm at Oak Ridge or by Dr. Wendell Brooksby, of the Utah State Agricultural College. There is little doubt that reputed livestock damage will continue to be reported for some time after the tests since livestock culture is such an important part of the economic life of the area. This suggests the desirability of the continuous services of a veterinarian with radiological training 4nd of a sound investiga- tive program."