incidence does not seem greater than that in unexposed Marshallese people." (p. 18) This statement was revised somewhat in the five and six year report after review of a table summarizing information concerning 1958 pregnancy terminations. The table showed that exposed Rongelap women had fewer live births, more miscarriages without live births, fewer recorded pregnancies, more women with one or more, or two or more miscarriages, and more pregnancies terminating in miscarriages than an unexposed control group. Especially significant was the fact that 41 percent of exposed Rongelap women who were pregnant had one or more miscarriages, while unexposed Rongelap women during the same period had only 28 percent of pregnancies end in miscarriages. report noted that “The date on pregnancy terminations . . The . also show an increased incidence of miscarriage in the exposed group." As to stillbirths and miscarriages in general, when the people themselves were questioned, they seemed to feel that there was an increase. On Rongelap, in particular, the people mentioned four instances of unusual deliveries after the bomb: one woman (supposedly. irradiated during the first three months) delivered a "grape-like'’ mass; another (supposedly irradiated at nine months) delivered a baby whose brains were outside of the skull; another woman's baby was born with a deformed leg and later died; and a fourth woman (irradiated at five months on Ailinginae) delivered a baby whose eyes protruded fram its head, making it look Like an “octopus.'' A check of health records later indicated that the baby with the deformed leg whose mother was said to have been irradiated at nine months, was born on August 17, 1960. Since so long a time had passed since the incident, it is possible that faulty memory has something to do with these stories -- however, it is equally possible that since no doctor was available to examine these stillbirths and reported Lag ent TERT