from qrie8, ) teemuse of ti.e physical conittions deseribed aLove, these reductions in coitami wt'o1 preta’l. ars mar te urper limit to be expected from wind, O-erational Feasi' iit, of Criteria Tt fea not the ‘neent here to disc: ss operational procedures, but it gould Le indicated tha’ t # computing of radiation doses as recomended fn Folie: Tis a o lL. one agsumes @ t“1.2 sate of 1 o Ci7"ieult tam. deca; as a firs: a> ryvimetion, ten a single grap. of dese rates versus times after d-. wi > can ie constr-ctec that = 11 represent a 30 reentgen effective ‘iclo-‘ca’ dow for ove vear, an edcitional family ef eurwes can be made t at will crow te tee answers tc te paranters of newamnec!. time would te avalla le ce‘ore evacuation an’ 0” ‘ow lor @ tine pergomel would ave to DOE/NY, remaino: o° *¢ - reétation appa io orter to vrevi:e for a sewiocgs of at least 1° roenirens, The iiches’ w.ole- ody gamma dose recorded for ar; locality where perso nel were prese it outside the Nevada Prowi ng Crounds was at Riverside Ca: ls, Nevada (@:0u- 15 people) follow: a @:ot mum-er seve. of Tazler onepper, ‘The maximum theeretical 4 oflait, garma dose was estimated to be 12-15 roentgensa, RICE ACIS FA G Bi wkie ED Battn