. 7a This gets a little tricky now, doesn't it Merrill? _She is any given sazpling station, the fraction of the fallout | depends on precipitation and vill vary from station to ao the actual collection efficiency for that statica the whole period might be quite different for the stations. EISESBUD: I think you will find from an analysis of the data, ares once you get beyond 200 miles most of vhat falls out is down by precipitation, In a station vhere it rains on averege, fallout would de about ten times as high as fallout in the case of a station vhore it didn't rain, HIT-Ls Then, you would say the collection efficiency for a then coeoe ical . That st1l1 vouldleave eon if you wee 50% for the efficiency, vith a considerable unaccounted for. I haven't worked 1+ out on that baats,| bet it must de on the enier of 70 to 80%. ep a: LULEJIAN? Do we take any ocean saxples here? 5° 2 + - EISENBUD? | LULEJIANs EISENSUD: You don’t have the fallout on the surface of the vater, I understanl thet in the TUMBLER-SHAPPER analysis, the polations, on the basis af data from fifteenstations which only six operation, continiously, ve vere sary 2 “A Monnrtmort of Eparay only ee