KELLOO s (continued) verification of whether this analysis is right would he tk find oat what the particle size in the rain was, and at preser we are looking around ~ in the absence of any informationd of — particle sige that is brought down by rain - and merely + to say what one would oxpe ct to happen ~ and ‘his is our best guess at the morent, WEXLER? Will there by civen any consideration to another possib mechanism for bringing doen radioactivity ~ say frow the ir « Suet by entrainment cf the air in the rain. Fe haven't considered this ~- although it will be implied fiz what I as foing to say about what could hapren in a cumuns type of shower. JI don't think I have answered your question, Br. Fexler, but perhaps we can talk about this this afternoon ” WEXLER: TY mean any grect volume of water coming down « take a shc ar bath - or Hiagara Falls, as an extrene exanple = brings qut & terrific quantity of air. You ses, this just by ahowar qurtsein: blowing away, The question then is; In an ordinary rainstora ~ how much air is actually transported down without any regort to Langmuir's collection efficiency just by simple entrainadént of ‘the air in the falling water, RELLOGs: Kell, 4f we can talk about sosething that we do recognisd as a Cefinite downdraft, that is the central rain core of @ stora with its associated downdreft, I think maybe I can part of your question, Danartraent gf Taarny” F.tC«‘SS FT dere rer