220 grens. This is your 107° calcium, Yea? that's right. Then we have used essentially the sane nucbers and withithese a Lo numbers what I get is that 4 mg/eq, mile — Ite not the number you want. if thats 4 milligrans of ar” per square will, give you in equilibrium of 1 afcroourie in the bones of pereon. adult | That's in 20 years growth? In equilitrius May I ask you how that comes cut to 270 micrograns per they coaparable figures? . Yours is higher, K'm sorry to say. This is 150 mile, I think, is what you sald. Thatta rights Yow suppose I state my asmuption in detail. You have 21 ‘ of calcium in the dene and 1 mierocurle of ar¥, which1) 521979 ws mlorogrens, therefore this ie 5x10of the azount of ca elute First of ali you are caning to a falacious conclusion in of reasoning. & of that You are going to finally state that the strontium deposited is related to the ancunt of calcium, 4a only true up to the point of vertain optimal calcium and beyond that it, doesnft hold. with a calcius deficient Gntakes In other words if you ous feed him both cal and 1 wy - ad aT ty Cosy . ~ tio 1 co MITCHELL @5/