and 1917, as far as they know, are the mst recent onesithat have been
made, and I suppose as good as anys
I talked te Dr. Fleisher at the Geological Survey some
ago and he
was very skeptical about the wet cheatcal strontius
My evidence I just put out in self defense 1s based en
ly upon the
up~take body ental of ar? — as compared with say caldium 45, end
also the endogencus, so we feel very definitely that
quansitively in almost the same way.
are treated
Of course if you
have
different fractions in the soll, although you think
strontiun
would occur in the sane chenical state as calciug, but
there might |
possibly te a fractionation there, but certainly after if gets to the
animal we feel that there is no fractionation.
KangSa
Perhaps we cught to proceed with the calculations,
Az i
have an idea of what the wicertainties are we can di
,
separately.
The next section -— how much available calcium there is
ecil,
f=
ow {9 that correct?
vv
‘SOLOMON
This estimate was gotten by calling up a man whos I have
at the Waltham Field Station - and saying ~ if you had
make «
guess, what guess would you make, and so it is not terri
KRAMISl
The old Gabriel used that,
Can't we do better than that?
Denafimant 92 Doergy
thiogwe
17
fr