A_10003
(contimued)
ever, I think there is practical justification for Imovihg how
fast the material vill diffuse in the stratosphere becaupe if
we are considering -— a let of the argusent yesterisy
centered arcund viether the material 414 diffuse rapidly|ia the
. gtratosphere or whether we could consider it as trapped
This would be a direct measurement of vhether this was tix
How for the looal fallout, I agree, we're not s0 oc
with it because it is the lover diffusion that ve're |
in for the local proble.
I haven't finished my statement yet. Well, I mean, if Tive:
given such a probles the first thing I'd look for, and {1 is
an eirburat, I'd look for a reinfall map and seo if herd’s
4
any ecincidence of high rainfall vith high counts, and
there wore, I'd be exceedingly pusaled, because this is tot
supposed to be particulate matter brought down. And thed I'@
say, vell, this shovs that this Langmuir collection
does not epply to this problem. I'd ask nyself "Well, vt
elee could tring it down ifthere's a conjunction betved
high counts and high rainfall?’ And then Iwould look fr
this air entraiment business, that is, air getting or
in the rein. I don't kuov of any other mechaniss that whilé
do thats that is, as far es frontal precipitation is
concemed. As fur as convective thunderstorm precipita
4s concerned, {¢ might be this terrific turnover along
Lines that ve discussed yestarday, But it apparently
”
7 otf Eaosay
are
OAS
<
WEILER:
2/7