(oontimmed) range of your rain or above it, that vould be some wseft informa tion, But I don't think you're ever really going te get) to tse your words, a three-dinensional ploture of the elow! in ite fine structure, I think that's just beyondour present Retwork’s capability. COOBRS 3 | | / If you hed such a ploture, you still wouldn't be able telepply it, because then really vhat you need would be fine #0 structure of rain, which, well maybe it exists from ean} rain networks, but WEXLER: . Well, radar could give that te you. Then I don't know wi you'd do with 4t if you did have it, even then. ‘hat, redlly, : would you do with it? Maybe I's putting words ia your but did you have scmething in mind of comparing the distaitu- tion initially in some coltwal with the distribution fUpMy séooSS — after a certain tine interval — to see thea vtat nigh be the vertical motions? Yes, but then if that vere tipa case, how do you— that's the sume ooliamyou are So with 4f thereis all sorts of shearing motions thet take oy a parcel from one cclimn to a different oolum KELLOGG: . T don't moan to Saply Yat At veld be aa onsy anaes,pete ; would be « very difficult one — exceedingly complicate do knov viich directions the winds went. Ifve have a e i. sonde network, we know vhere the debris ws initially f Observations at the test SIGE site. We canput these Deparros! of Energy — Hicter'sa’s Office ARCHIEVES 2/4