,

ABSHALLS

(continued)

i.

milk supply end water supply area. The country-wide ava

on sone average weighting is very heavily in the midvest for

the food producing areas. Then, we should try to caloulate for

a specific area a potential exposure to this risk and

tb

|

relate this to the amcunt that ons found in peoples’ rks,
taking account of their eges.

I think that in view of

fact that it is probably going te cost us a fair excunt &

money to get the samples, thay ought to be designed

very]

care-

fully, and also a good deal of ingenuity and money put

it e

the analysis. We can't assume ahead of tine that we arelgoing

to get very good ansvers, but at least ve ought to have

in

mind that we should produce an enswer that might allow u te -

give rough predictions from a series of detonations wing all ‘
of the work that vill go into the transport and se cn,

td

us if a certain mmber of bombs of specified yield ere sdt> v0

eff roughly in these locations at this tine of the year dpi
transported, viet 1s the besard in the various areas?

-

+,

Eisnetad's data indicates that it falls off fairly regularly, >
roe

feces the fallout — from the site of the detonation. On {the
other EK hand, if some of the material this morning

re

oe

—

indichted

that if you are locking at soil, this thing is liable to

very pesked, then you are going to have a big problen.
you are locking at himaan bones which sort of drav in an

|

1
aPorage

over the whole country, one might expect more regularities.
It's hard to say.

It's going to depsnd on whether this

=
the milk end the water, f.e.) the big

170

Select target paragraph3