" “WSs .vontimeed) froa mencry from reading the report. I might say though the difference = I wader if anybody here bes observed fact thet at the gurface shots the larger ancunt of the edtivity becomes incorporsted in large pieces which fallout mre rapidly ang closer in than the tower or in alr‘morst oo thatat you might expect a mich larger percentace of fallout, Yes, that is what I was hinting at ~- that if al) that LIBBY: went up SPENCE? ° Well, I don't believe that would change any of your conc ° I om sure that it was larger perbeps than fallout and even surfsce JAMGLE, but I don’t believe thet it is mre well suppose you took s figure like 10% or even 20%, it « isb't going to change your conclusions any, is it? I don't be that it wne way hich like 50%, Furthermore, you bave Elserbud's erideme that it is still HILL: eozing down < it must be up there, a lct of it. Another interesting thing about thet. You take « 0.8. 2 ment over a tyc week pericd, which we are locking at at present time, and find thet the fallout during that tvo period, extrapolated now to 1 January 1954, will vary fraslsay 10 & per m per squnre foot to say perhape 100. It scenes quite a spread in view of the diffuse nature of the my be attributable to rainfall at theses collection stat Depart a be « e - /0¥