TT
GON

@

DELETES VerStiN ONLY

APOMIC

"ERGY COMMISSION
CLASSIFICATION CANCELLED

MEETING NO, 869

BY AUTHORITY oF DF.¢7.q> , it-/2.
(Aprain)

BY

DATE EDEL)

10:60 2.m,, Tuesday, May 26, 19BY-

DATE 3/970
ae

“4g: US DOE ARCHIVES
Present

.

Also Present

526 US ATOMIC ENERGY

RG——-—--_LOMMISSION-—_

Collection £GF (- FRportestFEaA

Govdéon Dean

Dr, John C, Bugne

Henvy D. Srnyth

Gerard Smith

Fugene M, Zuckert

Newton I, Steer

[Box

-

Frank C, Legle

Robert L, Butenhoff
Herold D, Anarnosa

Checles A, Perry

Effects of Atomic Detonations on Weather
Mr, Dean asked if the adverse weather conditions at Eniwetok

following the Mike and King’ shots could be attributed to those detonations, Dr, Bugher said that according to a report by Comrnander Pate,
Staff Weathor Officer for JTF-7, these disturbances appeared to have

tcon caused by the shots. Photoggaphs of the King shot indicated that
“purtil shot tire the
her:Redbeen as predicted, but after the shot
Teavy clouds and sq
developed, The disturbances were a serics
of hia!h altitude (40, U

énd many thunder storms

storms over a wide area, with precipitation
The:
i. eather conditicns prior to the shot

thre were fivorable to Fain, and the large vertical ‘disturbances caused

vy the blast seemed to have “triggered’’ the storms which began at

Eniwetek and spread norti and west over an area of 250,000 square

2s, Theve was no darrage, and recognition of the phenomenon was.
2
Dr, Bughtzr added, however, that meteorological experts

t bien able to uncover any relationship between the recent
T2hthor conilliice ns throughout the U, S, and the Nevada tests,
Department of Eneray
Historian’s Office

ARCHIVES

[AFT

a

-

Richard W, Joh Folder 147 £5 - 4 pTaAeyef

M, W. Boyer

1,

+ |

-

- 325 -

-

JP

a7

Select target paragraph3