31

by Witkamp and Frank (1963).

It may be possible to distinguish

between translocation within the roots and downward movement
along root channels at Rongelap by comparing the ratios of radio—

nuclides within the roots and in the immediately surrounding
soil in core sections.

For example,

ment along root channels,

if there is greater move-

we would expect spt2>,

which is not

absorbed by the plants, to be most abundant in the soil adjacent
to the roots at depth, if there is appreciable channelization.

Pumice,
Radionuclides are also adsorbed by pumice particles.

No

detailed morphological examinations of the soil sections have
been made, but it is obvious in some core sections that a few

of the larger "hot spots" several inches below the surface are
associated with pumice fragments.

The retention of radionu-

clides by pumice fragments may be of importance in considering
soil~plant relationships in a few highly localized areas since
proliferation of roots around pumice fragments has been observed
(Sachet 1955; Kenady 1962).
beneath the surface,

However,

as pumice is rarely found

the effects of this material would not he

ware

oe

generally important.

We can not explain the differences in distribution of radionuclides between soil types but assume that the greater retention

Select target paragraph3