Table B-2. Comparison of results from the 1978 Aerial SUrV@Y and Terrestrial
Survey for 137¢5 specific activities in surface soils on Iroij {stand (B-2).
Field
____SCssud activity
number
location
B-2
contour
3770-75
3776-81
3794-99
Site 265
Site 266
Site 268
C
D
B
log
Site 261
3608-13
3614-19
3626-30
3602-07
3782-87
(pCi/g)4
Q.5-1.1
1.1-2.0
0.2-0.5
#
1.1-2.0
0 *
G
Site 263
Site 257
Site 264
B
C
D
Site 267
3788-93
Aerial Survey
label4
Site 262
Site 260
3620-25
0-10 cm
EG&G
6.0-8.0
6.0-8.0
G
0.2-0.5
0.5-1.1
1.1-2.0
0.5-1.1
C
Survey (pCi/g)
0.64
1.0
0.24
1.2
15
7
0.20
0.23
1.2
0.68
3.7
Average
NOTE.
0-10 cm
Terrestrial
Sampling sites are shown
Specific activity is decay corrected to 1987.
in Fig. A-4.
4a Concentration-contour labels and ranges are from Tipton gpg Meibaum (1981).
Table B-3.
Comparison of results from the 1978 Aerial Survey and Terrestrial
Survey for !3/Cs specific activities in surface soils on Odrik Island (B-3):
Field
log
number
B-3
location
3478-83
3490-95
3496-01
3740-45
3746-50
Site
Site
Site
Site
site
269
270
273
27)
272
EG&G
contour
label
B
B
Cc
D
C
NSCs 041 activity
0-10 cm
Aerial Survey
(pCi/g)?
0.2-0.5
0.2-0.5
0.5-1.]
1.1-2.0
0.5-1.1
Average
NOTE:
Specific activity is decay corrected to 1987.
aS
0-10 cm
Terrestrial
Survey (pCi/g)
0.56
0.39
1.0
1.4
0.09
0.68
ee
Sampling sites are shown
in Fig. A-5.
a Concentration-contour labels and ranges are from Tipton and Meibaum (1981).
B-3