thyroid examiner. Approximately 95%

of this 173-person cohort complied with
these examinations. Excellent agree-

Risk Assessment
The absolute risk coefficient for thyroid neoplasia is expressed as the number of excess nodules/thyroid dose/

ment was obtained between the two
examiners (87% observed agreement,

excess nodules are the observed minus
expected nodules and the thyroid dose
is expressed in grays (1 Gy =100 rad).
The most recent estimates for the mean

RESULTS
Demographic Characteristics
of Cohort
A mean of 64% of the populations of

years at risk/1 million persons, where

dose of radiation to the thyroid giand in

Marshall Islanders are 21 Gy (2100 rad)

for Rongelap Islanders and 2.80 Gy
(280 rad) for Utrik Islanders.” To calculate a single absolute risk coefficient
for both of these populations, previous
studies used the following information:

a mean thyroid dose of 8 Gy (800 rad),

the mean number of years at risk (18),
the observed number of nodules (46),
and the expected number ofnodules (16)

for the combined population of 251
Rongelap and Utrik Islanders. The

calculation for the expected number of

nodules was based on a prevalence of
6.3% for atolls assumed unexposed to

fallout.”

We determined a new value for the
prevalence of nodules in unexposed

Marshall Islanders. To calculate a new
absolute risk coefficient, we used the
expected number of nodules determined with this new prevalence value as
well as the above information concerning mean dose, mean years at risk, and
observed nodules for the original 251
Rongelap and Utrik Islanders.
Internal Validity
Since all thyroid examinations were

performed by a single investigator

(T.E.H.), it was important to validate
these observations. A substudy was designed that compared, in a masked fashion, results of the author's physical ex-

amination of the thyroid gland with

results of the physical examination by
an expert in thyroid disease. A group of
173 individuals whom the author had
examined during the previous two years
was asked to participate in this study.
Approximately 50% ofthese individuals
had previously had normal thyroid examination results and were randomly
selected from northern and southern
atolls. The remaining 50% had nodular
thyroid abnormalities. Each of the 173
people was examined separately by an
experienced thyroid examiner from the
University of Washington, Seattle. The
second examiner had no prior knowl-

edge of the author's previous examina-

JAMA, Aug 7, 1987—Vol 258, No. 5

kappa = .80).

the 13 primary atolls was screened, with
a range of 33% to 96% (Table 2) As
discussed in the “Methods” section, selected screening examinations were
performed on Majuro and Kwajalein

atolls to find those individuals who had
lived on any of the 13 primary atolls at
the time of the 1954 BRAVOtest. Because nearly a third of Kwajalein Atoll

was screened,it was added to the other
13 primary atolls for the subsequent
analyses, making a total of 14 study

atolls.

Prevalence of Thyroid Nodularity
Of the 7266 persons screened, 2273
were alive at the time of the BRAVO
test and were residing on one of the 14
study atolls on March 1, 1954 (Table 3).
Exposure to the short-lived radioio-

dines “J, *I, “1, and “I was therefore

possible in this group. Since these isotopes have half-lives of eight days or
less, exposure to radioiodines from the
BRAVOtest fallout was not possible in
persons born after 1954.
The numbers of people with solitary
thyroid nodules (mean estimated size,
2.1 em), previous thyroidectomyfor a
thyroid nodule, total thyroid nodules,
and the prevalence of thyroid nodules
for the reconstructed 1954 population
appear in Table 3. For the 12 atolls
previously thought unexposed to fallout
radiation, the prevalence of nodules

ranged from 0.9% to 10.6% (Fig 2). If

these atolls were not exposed to radioiodines from the BRAVOtest, we

would expect, in the absence of other
risk factors for thyroid nodularity, to

see the sameprevalenceof thyroid nodulesin all the atolls. To test this hypothesis, we performed a ,* analysis. The
results reject the null hypothesis that
no difference exists in the prevalence of
thyroid nodules among these 12 atolls

O¢ = 23.45, df=11, P<.025).

Predictors of Risk
for Thyroid Neoplasia
To better understand the wide variation in rates of thyroid nodules, we

thyroid dose estimates fdr people living

on these 12 atolls are lacking, the dis-

tance of each atoll from the Bikini test

site was selected as a proxy for the dose
of radioiodine received by the thyroid
gland. Weighted linear regression using
the age-adjusted prevalence of nodules
by atoll of residence in 1954 as the

dependent variable shows a highly sig-

nificant inverse linear relationship with
distance from Bikini (r= — .65, P<.002)
(Fig 3). Although northern atolls used
in previous studies as a source for unex-

posed controls were found to have a
prevalence ofthyroid nodules of6.3%,"”
the prevalence of nodules in our study
continues to decrease to less than 1% as

the distance from the site ofthe BRAVO

test increases. We believe a better esti-

mate for the prevalence of thyroid nodules in unexposed . Marshallese to be
2.45%, the mean prevalence of the two
southernmostatolls.

To examine risk at the level of the

individual, we used logistic regression
analysis, in which the presence or absence of a thyroid nodule was the de-

pendent variable. Not only distance but
also age and sex, 6 (the angle from 0°
latitude), and the product of 6 and distance were all significant contributors
to the logistic model (Table 4). The
addition of inverse distance terms or
higher order polynomial distance terms
was not significant.
The odds ratios obtained from the
regression coefficients show that the

probability of a thyroid nodule develop-

ing in a female is 3.7 times higher than
that in males (Table 4), a finding consistent with those of other studies of
thyroid exposure.“
The oddsratio for distance is 0.33 per
100 miles from the test site, and for 6,
0.59 for every 10°. In other words, the
probability of a nodule decreases ap-

proximately threefold for every 100

miles farther from Bikini and twofold
for every 10° going east to west in a

clockwise direction. Figure 4 shows the

fitted logistic model for males and females, given mean age, with the actual
prevalence data plotted. Again, as seen
with linear regression, the probability
decreases as the distance from Bikini
increases.
To betterillustrate the interaction of
distance and 98, we developed a set of
probability contours on the map of the

Marshall Islands using the logistic
model with all five variables. We set the
variable sex equal to females and the

variable age equal to the mean age of
females. For each of seven fixed probabilities between .5 and .01, the distance

was calculated for possible values of 8.

The valuesof6 selected were between 0°
Thyroid Neoplasia—-Hamilton et al
>

633

— — —_——

(masked to his previous examination)
when there was disagreement between
his results and those of the visiting

performed multivariate analysis. Since

—

were born, and their residence history
for their first five years was noted.

tions. In addition, Dr Hamilton repeated examination of any individual

-

- her 1954 residence in their native language. Individuals who were too young
to remember the 1954 thermonuclear
BRAVO test were asked where they

Select target paragraph3