Z So
June 22, 1979 LW
have, pngerseancablys‘Tost all trust in U.S" Governnent
scientists..

.

a? expressed these views on behalf of the feople of

Bikini Zaat month in. remarks to the UnitedNations Trusteeship
Counciz (see attachment at pages 10-11}, and I requested that

an interpmational committee of ‘ecientists, having no connection

.

with or interest in the U.s. “government or: the U.S. nuclear

testing program, independently ‘review, and assess the rosults

and conclusions of the northern Marshall Yselands radiological
survey, spetificallyias they: apply to'the safety of Bikini
ana Enew Islands in Bikini Atoll. Last week; I made tha same
request to the U.S. :qovernmert,” ‘suggesting thet the United

States fund an independent assessment: of the survey by a com-

mittee of international scientists orperhaps fund several
indepenmfent assessments by individual hon-United States

scientists.

.

;

Given the. importance of this curvey to the future

of the Bikinians, the past mistakes of U.S. :scientists in

maasuring and/or assessing.the safety of Bikini, and tha
uncerteinties concerning the long-term effect of low levels
of radiation, I believe that it is inithe interests of all
parties to seek independent assessment of-the survey. Althongh I have not yet received a formal reply from the United

Stetesg government, I am hopeful that + wild ‘respond favorably

to the Bikinians* ‘request.

a

“In the‘event that the United states does agree to

fund an independent review of the northernMarshall Isiands
rediological survey, would .you be: interested in parti

in this review?

Some of the broad questions the Bikinians

seek to have . answered are’ithe following:
ee!

Was the proper sethodology: used in the

northexn Marshalls survey?
|

,

'

oe

a Did the survey‘employ the best available
technological techniques‘and equipment? vO

ne Are the datacollected‘from the survey wocurate
and reliable? a
,
~~ Are the conclusions, predictions and riex
assessments concerning. the future safety of Bikini and Frew
Inlands valid? An analysis of this issue would, of courea,
niceegitate a review of both the.BUrv y andthe April,:(2978
medical examinations,

se

ce

a
tees

ot

yep
:
ioe
I

|

ye
a pert
i

ceeSe
Ne
lowe pe!
in

‘

.

|

‘

-

.

2 ere ee ee ee a +

Select target paragraph3