Lod

37

wl ik

MALES ‘963

a

E

-

z

*

||

:

:

Zoe

#

Rec «10%

s5

+

\

4

Or

|

|

3 r

fl

19

4

20

~

i

i

4.

L

40
x
60
AGE (years)

TO

LL.

80

i

90

id

Figure 46. Hemoglobin values of exposed males plotted
against age. Solid line represents mean level! of unexposed
male population, 1964.
T

r

T

3%

40
50
60
AGE | years)

”

80

30

Figure 48. RBC values of exposed maies plotted against
age. Solid line represents mean level of unexposed male
population, 1963.

T

FEMALES |964

6r

20

FEMALES .963

\

~
|

é

>
z

.

‘Ab «
ish

zi

a
*

e

.

s

a

a

*

*

.

.

+

.

°.
*

ZL
tad

=

4

a

:

e

oe

4

,

REC. 1O°4

ir

'

,

:

=

I
19

2

@)

a0
50
AGE (years)

60

70

80

90

Figure 47. Hemoglobin values of exposed females plotted

0

20

30

ag

50

60

70

80

90

AGE \ years)

Figure 49. RBC values of exposed femaies plotted against

against age. Solid line represents mean level of unexposed
femaie population, 1964.

age. Solid line represents mean level of unexposed female
population, 1963.

Ailingnae Population. The 16 people in the
Ailingnae population that were examined during

wasofinterest that the platelet counts for all age
groups averaged considerably higher in the Utirik

those of the higher dose Rongelap group. The 10-

The explanationfor this is not apparent. The erythrocytes, hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels were
about the sameas in the unexposed Rongelap people.
Chiidren of Exposed Parents. Blood counts of

these two years showed blood counts similar to

year platelet counts in the Ailingnae women were

considerably higher than the previous counts; the
reason for this is not apparent. The blood data on
this group of people are summarized in Tables 18
and 19 and Appendix 2.

Utirik Population.

The people of Utirik Atoll

who had been exposed to a very low dose of radiation (an estimated 14 rads of whole-body gamma
radiation) had leukocyte, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts of about the samelevels as seen in the
unexposed comparison population of Rongelap
(Tabie 18 and Appendices 3 and 4}. However, it

people than in the Rongelap unexposed population.

children of exposed parents compared with those
of the children of parents in the comparison population showed no significant differences. These

data are tabulated in Tables 18 and 19 and Ap-

pendices 4 and 5. During the 7th and &th-vear
surveys these children had shown slightly lower
levels of leukocytes and platelets compared with
children of unexposed parents. This difference is

not apparentat this time.

Select target paragraph3