! us Tabie 74. 1 ' ikini diet minu S Fandanus and breaadfruic. 1 Intake, creivda Mean cf areas Area i Suciide 50. 1975 - 73 i37. 2055 > 1375 Area 3 1980 ean ‘ 1975 = 1380 4 52.5 “3,175 24,668 22,060 729,994 737 231 1750 1997-10667 4.58 3.3400 701920883303 4S 723,965 22,612 2.2,5 and <~ 1980 =<.) 53.2 Table 27. -i.8 1975 22.4 t 32.3 Area = -3.3 739,240, 292 9 1980 Area | F1L.4 -0.9 724,330 1054 7975 =n 2980 39.2 39.4 33,119 72.133 30,098 779 “182-1123 5.42 3.42 5.37 Eneu diet with coconut from Bikini. Intake, 72Ci/da Area 1 Nuclide 1975 1980 33 Area 2 1975 51.4 Area 3 1980 1975 42.8 $0.5 1980 41.9 1975 49.9 600, 41,8 13754 4,069 20,991 17,347 725,794 18,963 78,155 19,272 902, 401 739,240p, 1.74 604 698 1035-497 3.25 3.04 5.85 1.60 marrow, and liver of each radionuclide Mean of areas 1,2,3 and 4 Area 4 1980 41.3 1975 48.4 1980 39.8 28,612 17,508 25,888 743 494 738 523 780 2.41 2.16 4.10 2.14 3.90 Focusing on the 30-vr integral dose via the terrestrial food chain are for the total diets from each island listed in Table 28 for Eneu Island and (Tables 28 and 29), it is clear that Table 29 for Bikini Island. 13764 accounts for nearly ail of the The altered diets are listed in Table 30 whole body exposure. and 31. accounts for approximately 60% of the Table 30 represents the Cesuim-137 Bikini diet minus the Pandanus fruit bone marrow dose, while 905, accounts and breadfruit, and Table 31 reflects for the remaining 40%. £ 60 239,240 Contributions the doses for the case in which the oO diet is from Eneu with the exception trial food chain are relatively insig- of coconut from Bikini. The Bikini Co and nificant. Pu via the terres~ Integral doses from 241s data represent the average of areas 1, would be similar to the predicted doses 2, 2, and = as previously described. ‘rom -34- 239,240, u. The 30-vr integral