Tabie i2
Padionuclide concentration in the ereundawater or fikini and =neu
Isianas
Bikini
Concentration~
375,
~ime
Ratio
3Ci/t
20.
(>C4/1)
739,240, (ECL/1)
238/239, 240,
‘well
sampled
Sol
Fart
Sol
Part
Sol
HFH 1
(0840)
(1145)
(1545)
~80
529
295
7.9
12.9
LE.9
87(1)
46(1)
38(1)
1.31
9.57
0.48
40.0
5.9
3.7
SFH 2
294
12.9
77
1.37
7.3
HFH 3
235
3.3
227
338.2
HFH 4
225
a)
260
39
23.2
AFH 5
330
3.5
180
25.6
13.4(12)
0.004 (60)
HFH 7
250
3.8
0.8
2.0(22)
0.022 (30)
1.0
Part
Sol
3.3(13)
1.3(32)
1.9(21)
71,3(4)
3.4(10)
0.026(9)
<0.004
<0.004
Q.04
(35)
<0.008
<0.001
Eneu
.
Concentration
Time
sampled
Sol
FWR 1
0835
1250
35.3(1)
30
(1)
FWR 2
EWR 38.
3B
FWR 4
Q
13705 pCi/1)
Well
a
205, (pci/1)
Part
Sol
Part
1.17(2)
0.73(3)
71
(cy
45.6(1)
Q.81
0.56
59.1(1)
9.95(3)
66
270
(3)
0.49(¢5)
1.0(9)
1.105)
0.57(2)
3.4(5)
(2)
32 (2) 0.59(2)-1.313)——0.03
0.11
4S01 = soluble fraction, Part = particulate fraction.
>
“3954 (£Ci/1)
Sol
Part
3.5(6)
3.3(8)
9.5
1.6
(10)
(22)
23.54)
8.4
(17)
0.72(22)
1.42(16)
0.32(30)
1.1 (15)
0.85(18)
0.67(27)
The values in paren-
theses are the 1-0 counting errors expressed as percentages of the listed
values.
bg = surface,
B = bottom.
The data used, therefcre,
to evalu-
Radiation Ecology, University of
ate the potential dose via the marine
Washington.
Table 16 lists the fish
food chain was obtained irom published
data used in the dose assessment.
data 8,30 and from unpublished data
Table 17 lists the data on clams.
supplied through the courtesy of
average concentration of
the radio-~
Dr. Vic Nelson of the Laboratory of
nuclides were derermined
from the data
The