4%

9
areas is generally sparse and the organic content of the
soils quite low, so weathering may accelerate the reduction

Table 1. BXTERNAL y-RBAY EXPOSURE RATES AND MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS
TO THE RADIATION FIELDS AT REPRESENTATIVE LOCATIONS ON BIKINI, ENEU

AND NAM

18105

Bikini
1 Near iagoon shore

19:0(77)

(iu brush)

18-9(78)

2 50 feet along transect 17-8 (73)
$ 50 fect along transect
5 300 feet
8 400 feet

22-8 (61)
27-2 (62)

7 1,800 feet
8 1,410 feet

3:0(12)

28(11)

24-8

24-0

21 (0)

$38(14)

248

25-0

113-4
36-8

103-2
36-1

2-4 (10)
11-3 (30)
12-5 (20)

2-7 (12)
35 (9)
40 (9)

88-8 (74)
28-:1(76)

10-5 (17)
4-913)

10-3 (9)
3-8(10)

island
8-1(78)
2 1,200 feet north of 1-3-0 (63)

@5 (12)
=—-1-5 (31)

0-4 (10)
0-3 (6)

Eneu
1 $00 feet inland—midNam
1 Near lagoon shore

18-1 (50)

2 Island centre
$ Near NE corner

17-2(48)

25-8 (39) 304(50)
60-6 (33) 119-5 (66)

22°9

06

(2)

ize the composition of the radiation field on islands where

we were unable to obtain field spectra, a large numberof
soil samples were collected from throughout the atoil.
These samples, usually obtained in several depth incre-

41-2
475

400
48°
35-9

ments, were analysed quantitatively by laboratory Nal(T!}
-spectrometry and also qualitatively by Ge(Li) spectrometry. We found that in high activity areas most of the
activity (two-thirds or more) was usually in the top
2 or 3 inches of soil. Because of large local variations in

41
5-1
34-1

66:3
1821

soil activity on all the islands, we could not calculate
accurate exposure rates in air from the one or two ‘soil

755
2040

The sums of the component exposure rates, obtained with the field spectrotmeter, are compared with the total exposure rates obtained with the jonization chamber (percentages within parentheses).

samples obtained per site. The soil samples proved very
useful, however, for identifying and determining relative

activities of the isotopes present, which were then used to

estimate the relative contributions of these isotopes to

site due to 187Cs, 15 per cent to Co and 10 per cent to

5

128b.

sium)

the exposure rates at the various sites*. The relative
exposure rate values obtained for the samesites with the

Natural emitters (uranium, thorium and potas-

were

almost

Also the greater proportional!

contribution of the shorter-lived *°Co and '**8b relative
to "Cs to the exposure rates in these areas will also cause
these radiation levels to decrease more rapidly with time.
To complement our field spectrometry and to character-

22-8

376
43-7

11 (2)
2-0 (1)

densely vegetated ureas.

entirely undetectable in the field

spectra. The composition of the radiation field on Eneu

spectrometer-ionization chamber system and from soi!

87Cs with some "Co and '**Sb. even though the exposure

sample analysis agreed quite well. Because the field
spectrometer and ionization chamber “‘see’’ large arcas

of blast areas, including high exposure rates and increased
amounts of "Co and !"Sb in the soil relative to 1*’Cs.

The composition of the radiation field on Lukoj, a
densely vegetated heavy fallout area, where exposure

was quito similar to that of Bikini, that is, prodominantly

rate levela were much lower. Nam, however, because of
its proximity to several test sites, had several properties

(approximately 30 feet in diameter), local variations are
averaged out and these measurements are very reliable.
rates varied from 60 to 200 ur./h, is indicated by the

The maximum exposure rates measured on Bikini

Atoll in 1967 were in blast areas very near the ground | Ge(Li) spectrum (Fig. 3). Approximately 60 per cent of
the exposure rate at the soil sampling site in the high
activity interior of the island was from *Co, 30 per cent
from '*5Sb and ™Rh and the remainder principally from

zeros wf tests. At one isolated area on West Eneman
near the ground zero for two surface tests we measured an
exposure rate just over 500 ur./h. Vegetation in the blast,
yr

r
t
:

Mey
865
aeigm 108 6

ean

ao?

3M
a

lf
a

379

1235p
1764

JM ce

ws

Orgy
ays

VY

/

|

ya fi
j

zm,

Rn
4m

|

250]
22:
462

633

|

\'

‘C3

666

wm"Rh
767

“

seo Sb
ia

1

;t
3

rR,

~\

toz ™Rh
10aT
nos

H

H

|
'

= 10"!

&

®Co
W7d~
*2n
i366

|

&

“Co

(32
j;

i

yl

1
i
10% tr

i

(I
I

|

10 J

0

Fig. 3,

LUKOJ

4

500

i

1,000

a

1,500

Channel

i

2,000

\

2,600

Ge(Li) spectrumiwith’peak identification and approximate energies In keV of a soil sample taken from Lukoj Island, a heavy fallout
area on the south-western rim of the atoll.
.

8,000

cee one

L: cation

of radiation levels in these areas compared with the more

Exposure rates (ur.fh)
Components
Field
—_Toniz“Co
‘Sb
spectro- ation
meter chamber

Select target paragraph3