ol

%

60|-

4

50u

_

Or
:

a

2

wi E
52

oz

CONTROL

=>
' a ‘40F -

DIVISION
TIMES —

Sia

2
<I

GB
<_

:

.

Py

30+

as
1

20+#—COLCHICINE—f
30!
t

\.\-

_
4

oO
I

Gt

th
on
hm
oS

2
a

O,@ AM.
oT
O,m@ P.M.
@ 75x 1075 M COLCHICINE|
@ 1.25x10°4 M COLCHICINE

rok

w

rT

CONTROL
DIVISION
TIMES

a

80;-

|

~— 92'—+|

o

T

un

7

RADIATION- INDUCED CLEAVAGE DELAY IN MINUTES

T

0

IO

20

30

l

40

50

Teme

60

7O

10]

MINUTES AFTER FERTILIZATION

3 are irOnl.

eam oerBE

10K

mms re-.

there- |

“

of
0

10

l

1

5

s

|

20
30
40
50
60
70
MINUTES AFTER FERTILIZATION

J

Fic. 29-—The sensitivity to radiation-induced cleavage delay as a function of the postfertilization time Arbacta zygotes
are irradiated. The dashed curve shows the effect of treatment
with nitrogen for 30 min right after fertilization.

80

terfer- |

i neil UE: EN

tte

Tic, 28.—The sensitivity to radiation-induced cleavage dewith : lay as a function of the postfertilization time Arbacta zygotes
They, are irradiated. The open circles and squares represent experi-~
ments on the same control gametes in the morning and afterion of ° noon, respectively. The solid curve is drawn through these
. lesser svmbols. The dashed curve shows the effect of treatment with
down ° 75 * 10°M colchicine for 30 min right after fertilization,
subse- ; while the dotted curve shows the effect of 125 x 10*M
colchicine treatment for 30 min right after fertilization.
Ta

ir exmore
acting as a basic protein with the cell surface.“ The
radia- *
chelating activity of EDTA is presumed responsible
in some way for its action. As discussed in last year’s

report,‘®) comparisons of recovery rates under the action of these various agents tends to implicate some

mctabolic activity in the recovery process. One indi-

Eee

. cation is that more recovery generally occurs during
extensions of the cell division period induced by physico-chemical agents like D2O, colchicine, and EDTA

» than during comparable time periods induced by met-

35r
w
Ld
=>

2

=

Z
>

=

4

a
Lu

CONTROL

bd

Oe
IMES

<q

a5

[ist
—l3—+!
’

Q
Li
Oo
2
Qo

2
]

=

o
bE

:

\

<=

0

iO

200—~CO«B—Ci4—C

SL

\

5s—CiaKO—Cia7—s«#B"OD

MINUTES AFTER FERTILIZATION

From analysis of the variations in radiation re-

Fic. 30.—The sensitivity to radiation-induced cleavage delay as a function of the postfertilization time Arbacia zygotes
are irradiated. The dashed curve shows the effect of incubation at 6.5° C for 30 min right after fertilization.

covered. Thus, the radiation response of zygotes that

tion afforded, for example, by hypoxia. Therefore, the

‘bolie inhibitors.

| §ponse curves as a function of the time during the
cell eyele that fertilized eggs are exposed, a “modifi: cation” effect of certain of the agents has been un-

ing exposure, it cannot be the usual type of protec-

have been treated with sodium azide, beta mercapto-

phenomenon has been termed modification. In a sim-

‘reated counter-parts. Since this reduced response is
observed at times when the agent is not present dur-

sensitize fertilized Arbacia eggs to subsequent radia-

‘thanol, nitrogen, and EDTA is less than their un-

ilar experiment, puromycin treatment, on the other
hand, has been shown by Rustad and Burchill*® to

Select target paragraph3