PER CENT CALCIUM CARBONATE

1.0
|

100.0 -—

L

L_

Oo

10.0

100

0

—io.0
,

—

—
p

Oo

5

Oo

oO

oO
Oo

m

—~}

~

-—

O

E

z

mn

€ao

10.0-—

=
°

&F
|

a

a
=

>

3

|

a

-o

SEAWATER

oO

=

z

aw

A

8

,

|

°nT
z

oO

=

c
=
»

Ag

_

lo 90
Cc

Oo

0

=

2

"n
>

O

Co

oO

4
oO

b
=
3

4

épb

<I

1.0 -—

°

—

rn
0.1

a

=

o

—

b—

x

|

oO

on
mb

=

=
Pp

+

m

—~

0. |
0.001

a

|

Lilet
0.01

1

Et tTiity
0.1

|

L

SEN Sa A

CALCIUM(gm/gm)
Fig. 12.—The variation in the [UJ/[Ca] ratio with the degree of calcification of the algae

cified of the organisms is in direct contrast to the
discrimination found for strontium in various freshwater algae.8) It would be particularly desirable to
extend this study to include the other Group II elements, Magnesium, strontium, and barium in order to
ascertain whether the behavior found in the case of
radium is peculiar to that element. Generally, those
organisms which have a high [Sr]/[Ca] ratio also
have high [Ra]/[Ca] ratios.2® In addition it would be

interesting to include in this more extended study
samples of the family Cryptonemiales, the coralline
red algae, which even though they are tropical orga-

nisms, deposit calcium carbonate as the stable rhombohedral calcite. In the argonitic Halimeda
opuntia the concentration of strontium carbonate is

1.3%,‘2)) while in the caleitic red algae its concen-

tration is only 0.35%.'?2) The reverse situation is true
for the concentration of magnesium.(2) This behavior
is the result purely of ionic size. Substitution of larger

ions for calcium in the calcite lattice is limited by the
steric factors of a close packedlattice.
REFERENCES

1. Bowen, H. J. M. Trace Elements tn Biochemistry. Academic
Press, London, 1966, pp. 68-73.
2. Mauchline, J. and Templeton, W. L. Oceaneg. Mar. Biol.
Ann. Rev. 2, 229 (1964).
3. Vinogradov, A. P. Sears Found. Mar. Res., Memoir No. 2
(1953).
4. Lucas, H. F. Rev. Sct. Instr. 28, 680 (1957).
5. Edgington, D. N. Int. J. Appl. Rad. Isotopes 18, 11 (1967).
6. Lucas, H. F. and Edgington, D. N. Modern Trends in Activation Analysis, Ed. DeVoe, J. R. National Bureau of
Standards Special Publ. No. 312 (1969), p. 1207.
7. Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry
Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Conn., 1968.
8. Lindner, R. C. Plant Physiol. 19, 76 (1944).
9. Morris, I. An Introduction to the Algae, Hutchinson & Co.,
London, 1967, p. 10.

10. Lewin, J. C. Silicification. Physiology and Biochemistry of
Algae, Ed. R. A. Lavin. Academic Press, New York 1962.

Select target paragraph3