a
1
ota
m,
boat
145
400
TAM-4 WIND DIRECTION
+
I
|
L
tm dior
o
ted
|
os00-- -
|
l
I
1
[=
oO
.
x
.
ae
jo" ~
.
fo
.
—*
| *
|
i
a
0
g
&
Pore
wo
a
=
T
ham
im .
™ te,
t
1
i
Sa
eg
=
<i 06
-
E
|
|
]
|
!
|
|
|
|
ere rrr
17
ul
g 04
So
|
—
|
|
-
:
|
naan
20
JANUARY, i966
o *
x< 08
=
_L
=
Io
7
‘east
|
5so
a"
]
™
“los
|
°
te 7
eb
|
|
60
=
yp
{
i20
ee
!
6
fp [8
rr
i
0.4
4
ee
T
TAM-4 S05 CONCENTRATION
a
=
S oso
s
>
che
wef
i
.
bao’
L
0.8
e
L
+
Io
T
aewe
% 300
_t
T
|
|
|"
|
.!
te
|
|
i
¥
TT
!
[
~
#60
MIDWAY TEMPERATURE
T
0
/
1
i
20
|
T
| °
F
|
|
i
wees
|
4
fo
nd
O
uw
|I
}
TAM-4 WIND SPEED
{
.
om
seafeee
ete
vende
dt
® oo
Qo
|
0
2
4
6
8
©
2
4
19 JANUARY 1966
6
i
20 22
24
Fic. 108——Winds and SO: at TAM-1 and 2, 19 January
1966.
TTT
2i
360
Fig, 106—TAM-~4 winds and SO. and Midway temperature,
16-20 January 1966.
4 300
3 240
=
2
-
[80
oO
da
xc
5 120
2
360
=
® 300
°
=
™
=
=
8ut
240
wr
5 180
«Qa
120
= 60
_
~~
=z
2
3
w
°o
wi
z
=
g |0
=
=
06
0.4
° o2
N
°
” 0.0
o
2
4
6
8
1
08
4
6
Bb
20
2
Oo
[966
Fic. 109-—-Winds and SO. at TAM-6 and 8, 19 January
o6
1966 .
.
:
.
.
with as much information as possible about the meteorological processes involved in pollution episodes.
oO
” 60
I
19 JANUARY
i O4
2
02
.
oO
8
4
8 ° laNuarYsobe.
1
18
20 22
Fie. 107—-Winds and SO. at TAM-3, 4, and 5, 19 January
1966.
z°
e
&
Qa
a
*
: 0.8
0
a
e
ea 10
3
z
a
-
i te RMee te and alelsaleCehabeA.beeha”
aterearniloh, Aaa re Mudd eee
*
Chicago weather phenomena and SO. pollution
sources interact in a number of different ways to
produce episodes of severe pollution. The case studies
presented in this paper are a first step in our study of
these events.