Desert Rook gustodial force, This action continued to permit cee elinination of a1] moter pool end mctor maintenance wities within Camp Desert Rook. S. Programing end Control of feat Funds '- . @» On the basis of experience iuplemantation of an UPSEOE-ENOTHOLE agreement eation of HFG expenses between the A and the indefinite period agresment was negotiated and Eauagey, SPOO, ASS, and the 6G, Bw. gained through the covering the alloDOD, a revised signed by the This represented the first leng range cont allocation agreexext usable for budget purposes. be OG the dasie of previous experience, DET representatives negetiated an understanding with AK represen- tatives ty which more useful information would in tho future be obtained relative te DOD finds expended through AED for acti- vities at the HFG. This agreenent, not completely confirmed by $0 June, provided, among other things, for a breakdown of pur~ poses for which D@® funds were expenied by the A. It also provided for AES publication of a statexent covering the policy by Which overhead charges would be aliconted te DOD construction and other ‘Mmpport provided by ABC at the HFG, 6 During June, 4% was determined that there existed no further requirement for programming ané allocation of UPSGCT«KUOTHCLE funda, As a result, the balance of UPSHOT=-KNOT~ HOLE funds was released to Hy, AFSUP, far reprograuning. @. As Operation CASTLE progressed, CASTLE R & D funds were reprograumed to the sad that the total estimated BR & D cost of DOD effects teats were decreased from $7,776,760 as of 1 Jenuary 1956 to $5,611,000 as of 36 June 1984. ®. Experience previously gained concerning Extra-Military costs of 22 teste was analysec during this period, and an Extra-Military budget for the forthooming ZI test wae developed. This action indieated both that accumulative exe periense permitted a more accurate estimate and that Betra- Military costs of ZI effects tests wore decreasing due in part to the fast that previcusly acquired equipment could be reused, Apo