io : Bo Pole ms . <0 . 1° ‘ fete ® , s os ae a \ tt € ° 8 , ae 3 ~ oy i r . guides far porsoune) in their responsibilities under such Security Directives as AR 38068, M Bulletin 206 esries and Exea:tive Orders; and, to inplenent sock’portions of these directives es are applicable te Pee The‘follewing were pedlisheds tooarttytone Hey 1s86 Safopus 2-86 Seourity Edveation mayd ins Glass!thea aa ar re: oo - Aeoees Frovetures 85 Jan 84 intorsation 16 dm 8 he he‘Pequested by the Chief, AFSNP, the Prenelaen's aise inepeeted on 8 Fabruary 1964 to determine the elaseiHoationof existing steackures, 4 reacumendation was mide to the | Chief, AFGNP; that the ere ef the structwes te doxn-~- Graces %oAanaeiane : . &. During this geriod severed 8 eenrerences were held with ir, " Hightower Soeurity Officer, Les Vague Field Office, VEARC, and Mp. 3, MoOrew, Security Office,Sawtea fe Operations oftics, te diaeuse the integration of AIC and BOD eecurity operations cwring tests at EPG, The neotings culminated with thedratt= iug Of w propeced AUC-D@ Basurity Agreenent; a compilation rn seurity inatwuctians eabodying AND ard DOD seourity. precepts for eoraran Siw S706 Administration Pe= Orgeaieational Chars integrated crgnizations a ional, ehart; alloontion ) offios space, 6s Beourity lectures covering all phases of security and classification were presented to all DAT militery and civilian persennel on2 April i584, Rach newly assigned person was given an individual security triefing of epprosisately ene (1) how duration peter to assignnent to a division aoffice. . 7. A soeurity inapection was eosducted on ¥ April 19% by Mr. H. Fish, Intelligence and Security Division, Piel¢ Comané, During his eritique ef the inspection with the Directar, Mr. Fish ennouneed that the results of the inspseticn wore satisfactory insofar as he oodild dsternine,. #3i0-