disease does not militate against there being a causal relationship in this
particular case.
It is my opinion that a strong probability exists that [veteran’s]
current illness is service connected.
Findings of the BVA and Basis for Decision: \n granting service connection for
acute granulocytic leukemia the Board found that the veteran’s duties involved
association with atomic materials and on occasion known exposure to atomic
radiation andit said:

The official record of measured exposure to atomic radiation and

other evidence of record do not affirmatively show specific exposure in

an amount medically considered to be dangerous. However, the opinion
of the independent medical specialist is that, although the case is very

complex and reliance must be made on “‘validity of conjecture” rather

than on any definite demonstration of excessive exposure or even any

impartial or disinterested corroboration of much of the veteran’s history,
there is a strong probability that the feukemia was the result of exposure
to atomic radiation during service. The specialist has gone into the
various ramifications which led him to this conclusion and further
discussion does not appear to be necessary. His opinion certainly raises a
reasonable doubt, within the range of probability, the resolution of

whichin favor of the veteran warrants a grant of service connection.

CASE NO. 30
Type of Injury: Rheumatic Heart Disease.
. BVASs Decision: Denial Affirmed.

Date of Decision: 1965.
Appellant’s Allegation: That veteran’s death from rheumatic fever was the
result of radiation exposure he received while in the service.
Facts: Veteran was born in 1907 and had active duty from March 6, 1943 to
December 31, 1946. Veteran was a photographer aboard a ship in the Pacific
during the 1946 underwater atomic tests. Veteran was hospitalized in July of
1961 and died on December 25, 1961 of rheumatic heart disease. Service

records revealed that veteran’s ship was not at anytime in radioactive waters
during the period in question.
Medical Evidence: At the time of veteran’s hospitalization in July 1961 he was
treated for myocardial infarction. Signs of subacute bacterial endocarditis and
renal insufficiency were found. During his hospitalization a bone marrow
examination revealed no abnormal cells, or blood dyscrasia. His heart was
enlarged, toud diastolic and systolic murmurs were heard, and there was
increasing renal insufficiency. In spite of intensive treatment his illness pursued
an unremitting downhill course and he died on December 25, 1961. An
autopsy revealed an old myocardial infarction, inactive rheumatic heart disease
with aortic stenosis and mitral insufficiency, superimposed subacute bacterial
endocarditis, pyelonephritis, embolic glomerulonephritis and nephrosclerosis,
and focal acute hemorrhagic lesions in the lungs, liver, spleen and skin, which

had occurred at the time of death and without evidence of any vasculities.
Bone marrow was not unusual. His death was due to cardiac failure and uremia.
The pathological material was subsequently submitted by this Board to the
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology for review. They concurred in the
diagnoses of the hospital and reported that no changes due to ionizing
radiation could be recognized in the tissues.

Findings of the BVA and Basis for Decision: In finding that veteran’s death was
not due to the effects of radiation incurred while in service, the Board observed
in pertinent part:

In order to decide whether or not the veteran’s death was, as

contended, due to atomic radiation, it must be determined that he
received radiation, that the type and amount received was harmful, and
94

95

Select target paragraph3