Atoll. Essentially, it represents a compromise of cost, radic- logical and other factors, which will be far short cf the theoretically ideal "Case 5". (Vol. I, § 5.4.5). Exclusive of contaminated soil and scrap Gisnosal costs, the cleanup cost for Case 3 is $35.5 million and for Case 5 it is $81.6 million. Comparative soil disposal cost estimates are $7 million for Case 3 and $92.2 for Case 5. We appreciate the political and practical realities of seeking sums ori the order of $100 million from the United States Congress a in these times of grave concern about the economy, but given the ‘rationable stated above, it is Case 5 for which funding should be sought and for which funding should be given. Finally, quite apart from any cost-benefit analysis of the nuclear testing program, as a result of a recentdecision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (People of Saipan, etc. v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, etc., 502 F.2d 90 (1974)), the obligations imposed by the Trusteeship Agreement under which the United States administers the Micronesian Islands has become legally binding and enforceable. Under the terms of Article 6 of the Trusteeship Agreement, the United States is required to “promote the economic advancement and self-sufficiency" of the Enewetak People; to "protect [them] against the loss of their lands and resources"; to “promote the social advancement" of the Micronesians; and to "protect [their] health." obligations. These are the express Beyond that, like any trustee, the United States bears implied duties to protect and promote the best interests of the beneficiary in every way.