rd ae ‘onsoe, a ~ - UNCLASSIFIED_ — " BIOLOGY ‘AND MEDICINE (3) Growth and development. In the exposed Rongelap children from about 4 through 9 years of age there was a slight lag in bone maturption (based on X-ray studies of the left wrist), and these childrenfwere slightly shorter and weighed slightly less than unexposed children of the same age. _ 4) In utero effects, pregnancy, fertility. ‘Pregnancies in the ex osed were observed in the babies irradiated in ulero. 48) Psychic effects.. Little or no effect on the psyche related diation ‘exposure or displacement has been observed in1 the people. their ra- . ) @E |_ (noted in most of the Marshallese. b. Beta lesions There remained in the exposed Rongelapese 15 residual which showed varying degrees of mild atrophy, scarring, and da lesions,. gment “ aberration. No chronic radiation dermatitis was noted. An increase in incidence of certain conjunctival and corne abnormal-__ as ahhada ities was noted in the exposed groups. ic. Internal radiation There were no acute or subacute effects from internal de osition of _ falloutt isotopes. because the body burden of radionuclides was Jow. te « 2. Late effects a. Penetrating radiation (1) Premature aging, shortening of life span. One death (at the time of this survey) or 1.5 percent incidence in the exposed Rong@lap people compares favorably with 5 deaths of 3.0 percent mortality in the ‘ Utirik people. In general, the exposed people did not appe@mr older or | to have aged faster than the unexposed Marshallese. @) Degenerative diseases. - No increase in degenerative dis HSeS: was noted in the irradiated people as compared with the unex tions. (3) line phosphatase activity of neutrophiles:or increase in asophiles _— '. indicative of early leukemia. 38 ~ UNGLASSIFIED Of ARCHIVES- See

Select target paragraph3