45°
“sa
24
40 94,72 6
ays
MO”
TiME
2
3
&
5
YEARS
AFTER EXPOSURE
9-83.
6
PLATELETS
x» 10° 4
FL AIELETS x to74
40-
?
=
25°
ee
sc
Lia Wee
Figure +3. Mean platelet values of expo
Ronigelap
people from time 9f exposure through 7? ‘wears post &Xposure. Stars represent mean v alues of unexposed Caan -
iO
parison populations +
-
oe
.
ath
ope or.
:
30
40
AGE (YR}
50
60 70
#0
>
Figure +4. Platelet counts of exposed Rongelap- write .
plotted against age. Soja line represents mpan legge 1
45°
40%
unexpited'thale pdifulatiotg: aaio TE
35 -
100 F
—
"SEEage
ae
fwane
Looe
MINIMUM
Y/Y
COUNTS
30-
- Me. Le.
CUMULATIVE PERCENT
aoe
PLATELETS
«10 4
20
a
Re:
Ex
60-
a/
40--
~
/
/
_ 7 YEARS POST EXPOSURE
/
/ fr.
i961
20r-
:
eet
ap females
mn level of
i&
ey °
8
-
16
>
oe ro
24
32
40
PLATELETS 11074
4800
Me
56, GA
mo
ge ee
Figure 46. Platelet cumulative percent distribution ci
for exposed compared with unexposed, popula tié#lr
:
A
3 ME
wt
parents of witom one or both faa pekian
were compaged‘with those of chien ‘With un-
rode
ms -
demarcate
tetkemia
0 SuRvey
No evidence of leukemia was detected in anvof
the population studied based on leukocyte counts,
.
» COMPARISON POPULA™.-C's
some people, but in no case wasit assocfated wit
other,jetdings suggestive of leukemia. Basophil
countss#ere elevated slightly (to 2.48%) in a 7year-old exposed male (No. 3) who had showed 2
similar elevation in past surveys but no other sign
suggestive of leukemia. The individual valuestor