wens
372
86.
Sutow and Conard
de Bellefeulie, |
won tO Man. Part 2, s.cta radio.
Sd:
wud.
Acin
Costes
16, p.
ance
ustin
Tomia
rat
deny
An evalustion of u
_Bavards 6: the medical
J. Roentycnol od: 090,
vs . Bistz, EL, Pasternack,
M.:
Radiation
dose
diaynostic mecical x-ray procedurcs to the
G2
$3.
on man, Washington,
trom
miment Printing Ofkce.
t Conunitive on <AAtomic
WO
Etsenbuc.
sopulatiun or New Yors City, Am. j. Dee
rue,
34: 1551, 1964.
Tac implications or the repos
racivlowicul hazards 1
om
. 4 :
Committee ,,
oh
At
aXuauiGd.
c
peseny
Nui.
ue
36: 230. 1963
Sewer, 2.
Nereiaxes. ue &y anG Saen
BE. iL. Radizuon exposare from rudisisGiu vs
im pediatric
Gee
wand j. Mica. 2
Re aia.
sinduced
cancer,
s Company. 5.
Mebean, P.O. and Jud
Ioioves, and bone, New York, i264,
Geinlc
Cancer
woot
a
Sa,
Bees, A. MM,
Low level
American Association for the A
i
o> Science pol. no. 39, Washing:on, 1959.
Upton, A. oe ‘The dose-response
ryan!
Kes.
J. 2: The enw
of
Webb, J., Giles, D., anc Flowhtt,
unt disease in childhcod and
rauiauoa in utero, Lancet 2:
into humiun bone.
Go.
ry
JM, Dol R., and NL,
e@xX-
G, Srit
eu
ier easenaic, @NDGsur
ven Charlotte's stospitus,
ae)
ae:
cu
Vos
\,
aaah.
agsue
ara eel Dy
103.
ws Pub. Flealth ws
Federal Recinion Counci?
Binetics of Cait
Pala
ANUS.
Woateh
|
im pucatio
ott
Fucis Gi radia
rradiatioa, chap. Voin re
ee
p. 20.
Revi
Dunnam,
rch.
any
on
at
104, 1965.