ch
MBER
ok
ON
mf
Dr, Berkner. made a few comments which may be summarized ae
follows: (1) We did have a shortage of vehicles, (2) By 1963-65 we will-need.
science to fill the available payloads, (3) fundamental science. needs to be
greatly (ocrensedand supported by NASA,
|
|
Dr. Rossi made several suggestions, ‘First, the problem of plasma
measuremerts of planetury probes indicates that the JPL-NASA relationship
is very poor., JPL wants out-house' research but it must be set up by NASA
headquarters,
|
|
Comments from ‘Schwartzschild - The astronomy: program has definitely
improved due to the high-level work of Kisty, the President and Glennan, For
example, there seems to be a greater number of vehicles authorized. On the
working level, however, tke situation is terrible. He recommends an working
|
:
|
|
|
Dr: Rossi added that early participation of the scientists in the project
is desirable,
. Comments from Hebb - He feels the Panel should stay away from detailed
setup before general recommendations are made, He suggests the formation of
3 an advisory committee of outside scientists to advise Glennan directly,
Dr, Kisty recommended that an eyes only memorandum for Glennan, Dryden
This
ae
| and possibly Horner be prepared outlining the Panel's recommendations,
naomieee
engineer and a scientist.
oe ee ce ee eel et a et ee
group on aproject consisting of no more than 3 men: project engineer, payload.
| memorandum to be followed by a meeting with Dryden to diecuss the details of
2 thé recommendations, The Panel outlined the points.to be covered in this
SERRE