sOLZMAN s
I think that first problem can be handled witheut balloons.
I don't see why you can't do Lt the way we have done it in the
past-——-by metecrolegical winds.
The latter probles-—-that is to
find out how much is really up there after 6 long period of
time and the rato at which 4t is being scavenged-~it evens to
mo is the real problen.
KELLOGG:
Of course yeur wind analysis doesn't tell you anything shout the
density; it merely says that a part of the cloud is started
here, if it was all there would now be bere, and what didn't
fall out or diffuse would all be over bere.
trajectory analysis to denonstrate that.
Wobedy objects to
hat we don't know
ia how it moves in the vertical when it la fellewing tue
trajectory, and it was suggested that we de have a very complste
eut of the surface new, to show the density in a long twodizensions at the surface.
We really don't know what path is
followed by the debris in getting to the surface. We can only
work backwards, using a columnation of trajectories and guessing
about diffusion.
It's generally a rather poorly controlled
experinent; we can only use our winds plus an observation of
ene plane, in this case the surfaces.
I would like to see
observations in 3-dinensions,.
COONS s
This observation in another layer ef the atmesphere seezs
indeed a difficult one when you consider you are using balloons
and having the difficulty of having them where we vant then.
OE ARCHIVES