qaenel.
l
include that of customs inspector for military personne and control
of use of two assigned J-boats.
During a maintenance stand-by status,
there would be no assigned J-boats, the requirement for a customs in-
spection for military personnel would still exist, there appears to be
no reason why the consolidation of all stevedoring and port command
functions under a single agency could not be accomplished.
1.
POL (Tab "L"),
Holmes and Narver currently operates a
40,000 barrel capacity POL farm on Parry Island. The DOD currently
operates a POL farm on Eniwetok Island which is being rehabilitated to
a capacity of 50,000 barrels. Maintenance of the latter is provided
by H&N. Assumption by the AEC of operational responsibility for the
Eniwetok Island POL farm is quite feasible in that only one full-time
employee will be required therefor.
m.
Construction Program (Tab "™"),
The Subcommittee reviewed
both the AEC and DOD construction programs (current and projected) for
the EPG and does not consider that there will be any change in their
present status.
n.
Manpower (Tab "N").
Consolidation of activities and trans-
fer of responsibilities as described above would permit a reduction of
EPG forces from the current 1400 level to a total strength of 495 of
which 69 would be DOD personnel. Six months would be required for
such a phase-down in the time sequence illustrated at Tab "N". No
attempt was made to evaluate the requirement for approximately 200 H&N
employees alloted for "maintenance activities".
be an AEC matter.
o.
Budgeting and Funding (Tab "O'),
This was considered to
In order to apportion
the estimated EPG operating costs between the AEC and the DOD, it was
considered that the DOD share should be the additional cost to the
AEC in assuming current DOD functions, plus some part of the camp operating cost. It was considered that all other operational costs are
properly an AEC responsibility. A suggested ratio for apportioning
the camp operating costs is as follows:
DOD strength 4 Contractor personnel on DOD functions
AEC personnel 4+ Contractor personnel on AEC functions
Such a ratio results in 26.6% of the camp operating costs chargeable to
DOD.
The detailed calculations from such method of cost apportionment,
contained in Tab "0", summarize to:
ABC
Actual Strength
Estimated Annual Cost
426
$7,600,000
DoD
69
TOTAL
$2,140,000
495
$8, 740,000
6
“SOREL
F265
b- i: (- po
44