ape
moh,
fie
«se nme
ovr,
herr
ope.
9
developed in this stuft re, ©
is desirable that other le e* 2.
groups consider then, . tue jie €
so
that
sistency
It
is
as
a nation
recommended,
«)
,rops cst
we ma:
in the beneficia: Ge.
«,
tnerefi
~
Ceasones
f
Tbk
opre
.
ot
34
€
yri
ty
8
ais
Ae
eo
& tess
dy
in this report be considersc (+ yg sdawe Fy
of
.tograns tm
agencies and the States where | -.
os wale
» j*e@,ar ¢ *areugr
Furthermore, the Council
oe
eos Red
agencies to assist ali ie 2.: |
woh
0 16 sre
e@e
their programs and ‘he pr:
recommended in this srud
One other situation which co1.€
to our operating responsibilities swer
Act,
relates
to
Sections
6.20
ani
t
ns
ot:
2
pro
we lar
feet,
kiouiar.:
les.e
wlv os
Pr
@tmosphe
.
tion in uranium mines.
The whole ra.
3 teased ou tte che
>
must be judged against the risks its
ae
Tne reper
mgs
no in-depth review of particular
S*S wa
nate Bf
Me
bare a
minimal for the standards recomme ie:
Hower or,
nee oa
it is indicated that the leveis reoumeiud- |
the NORD in. 6
uranium mines are exceeded
Who) S a an. Cha «vee FB
given this problem, no recommende'’ ©
r
uy
8 nat
at
:
Ie is further stated that while wa.
* che persis
ope
”
probably suffer major impairment
he sare . of Safety
«to 4
We do not believe that the recat ve su we
raised 25
veter,
factor authorizing an apparent e ceprio: ¢
econmmende
star. ari
full consideration has beer give
o's vi etae
tae rennet =
'
the added risks.
It is not our
odere ard y tris
the
om
!
sidered this point.
The question
9»
+ mespuers
orta- ie
mines must be faced directiy at
cone
ie,
rde
ibe ow oa
Contracts Act, this Department
“
Posy ob bak
;
.
safety codes on public cor rate
4
x
bok
point.
We appreciate tue
ypypor’
pe
7
od
;
(
Le
;
eu HECay
ai
ve
ve