-—
SECUNDLYe THE DELEGATIONS ~
RIGHT TO FREELY CHOOSE OUx POLITICAL FUTUREe®
DGREED THAT MICRONESIANS HAD TRE RIGHT TO ADOPT A CONSTITUTION AND LAWS
WHICH ARE CONSISTENT WITH THEik OWN NEEOS.
THIRDs THE DELEGATIONS
AGREED THAT THE PEOPLE OF MICRONESIA SHOULD HAVE CONTROL OF THEIR LAND.
GaLY THOSE EASES AND OPTIONS WHICH WERE NEGOTIATED AS PART OF
COMPACT wDULD FALL UNDER UseSe AUTHORITY.
WOULD Ovi
THE
OTHERWISEs ONLY MICRCNESIANS -
MICRONESIAN LAND AND ONLY FICRONESIANS KOULD EXCERCISE
THE
©
POWER OF EMINENT DOMAIN
"THE PROGRESS MALE AT HANA IN SECURING RECOGNITION OF MICRONESIAtS
RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATICON« TC CONTRCL OF LAWS» TO BASIC OWNERSHIO CF
LAND, LEFT ONE LARGE AREA OF DISAGREENENT TO BE SETTLED IN PALAU.
D>
THIS
wAS THE ISSUE OF TERMTNATICNs OF HOW -- AND BY WHOM -- ANY FUTURE CCii~
PACT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES 4D MICRONESIA MIGHT BE ENDED, AT KANAy
THE UNITED STATES PROPCSED THAT TERMINATION REQUIRE THE CONSENT OF
SIDES»
WITHOUT THE OTHER SIDE'S Y
o.
PACE FOUR RURSSAAS595 UNCLAS
-
INSISTING CN MICRONESIA'S NEED TO CONTROL
DESTINYs
. ~~
~
CONSENT == wAS AN ESSENTIAL SAFEGUARD OF MICRONESIAN'S RIGHTS.»
"WHILE
ITS POLITICAL” ee
THE MICROMESIAN DELEGATION ALSO RECOGNIZED THE UNITED STATES
NcED TO &E AGLE TO MAKE PLANS ON A LONG-RANGE BASIS AND TO 6E CONFI-
~
DENT OF A STABLE PRESENCE
2
IN THE PACIFIC.
"THE ICRONESIAN DELEGATION PRESENTED AN APPROACH DESIGNED TO ACCOMINTERESTS OF BOTH SIDES».
WAS ACCEPTED SY ECTH
tn
MODATE THE
my
Ge 3£005
890TH.
AT HANAy ANO AT KORORs THE MICRONESIAN DELEGATICN MAINTAINED
TRAT UNILATERAL TERMINATION == BY EITHER SIDE
iF
1DESe
IN
ITS ESSENTIAL PRINCIPLES
AS SLIGHTLY MODIFIED CURING NEGOTIATICNSs
THE TERMINATION PROPOSAL HAS FOUR MAIN FEATURESe
PONE?
FAIR TEST»
VO ENSURE
IT_
Department of Energy
Historian’s Office
ARCHIV
THAT THE RELATIv OF FREE ASSCCIATION
=;
Lo
|
IE GIVchk \A
The COMPACT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND WICRONESIA WILL BL TU