are listed in Table l,.
Table 1
Major Participants in the Data Evaluations Group
Group Leader:
D., Wilson, LLL
Data Handling and Computations:
W. Martin, W. Phillips,
Calculations:
Y. Ng (LLL), B. Bennett (HASL),
(LLL)
B. Rich (LLL)
Evaluations and Applications:
W. Robison (LLL), B. Rich (LLL),
C, Richmond (LASL), D. Wilson (LLL)
Consultants:
J. Tobin (TTPI), E. Held (AEC),
A, Seymour (U of Wash.), P. Gustafson (ANL),
M, McLaughlin (HASL), R. Conard, M.D. (BNL).
5.
Communication of results,
Finally, that the evaluation, as it proceeds
in time, will be in close communication with the Division of Bio-Medical
and Environmental Research (DBER) through a review committee headed by
Dr. Nathaniel Barr (See Figure 1).
The advantages to such a communication
are two-fold:
a.
For maintaining point-in-time cognizance of our activities, methods,
and results, which will enable DBER to review the final product more
intelligently and more effectively under time constraints, and
b.
For providing guidance during the prorress of the survey and to
serve as a point of contact for information available across the
whole research proyram in the AEC on environmental radioactivity,
including AEC experience in DBER and DOS regarding radiological
assessment and rehabilitation on Bikini.
The "Radiological Report on Bikini Atoll," April, 1968, by Dr. P.F.
Gustafson, then of DBM/AEC and now of ANL, provides an excellent backdrop
against which to view the current Eniwetok evaluation program,
Comparison
and contrast of the two situations (Bikini and Eniwetok) regarding radiological
aspects provides a number of facts useful in developing a program plan,
-7-
Most