ao
\e3°
10°
eee
164°
20°
oo
les°
a
t0
a
oo
tere
ao
|
FORECAST AREA
OF FALLOUT
(METHOD 1}
tae
FORECAST “HOT LINE”
(METHOD 1)
ey
FORECAST AREA —~
A
OF FALLOUT
an
(METHOD 2)
J
pe
ma
ef
a2
(Merton
3
™N —
\
PS
MEASURED ISODOSE
LO
v4
RATE CONTOURS
(e/prot the) \
.
Wa
‘
FORECAST “HOT LINE”
a
‘
|
Z
-~—f
7
i5
‘
\
lf
,
4g
f
f
\\
VD
7
/
f
PARAMETER ASSUMPTIONS USED
. CLOUD TOP. 85,000 FT
2. CLOUD BASE: 52,000 FT
3 CLOUD DIAMETER: 50 N MILES
4 HOT LINE FALLOUT: FROM 60,000 FT
METHOD 2: TIME AND SPACE VARIATION OF THE WIND FIELD
NOTE: CONTOURS FROM REFERENCE 13
WERE CONSTRUCTED ON THE BASIS OF
EXTRAPOLATED PRELIMINARY DATA ANO
ARE SUBJECT TO FINAL CORRECTIONS
‘
2D
7
/
G
=)
:
)
VY
C-q7-— —
Wea
[™.
\,
1
L Lo é]
.
v
~~} f-—
MEASURED
| “HOT LINE”
7
na
L—
METEOROLOGICAL PARAMETERS
METHOD |: TIME VARIATION OF THE WIND FIELD
~y
e
Cy.
}
r
5
pp
:
\,aS
ei
B
AIA
~
A
1 ~ALLY?
.
xu
\Ve
/
| a atone
Ty om 4
‘
fo
4
+L
7
FS
2)
\
if
(
\-
Zh}
7
|
|ft /%
om
\\ \
SIRIOR ERCHMOLTE ATOLL
4 UNI
SURFACE ZERO
4
} monsear
ate
a
fof
Figure 4.8 Predictedand observedfalloutpattern,ShotZuni. -
'
er } i
gy
te eave