Muckle
June 28, 1988
-2-
When reviewed with a bit of perspective, including bearing local
conditions in mind, and the fact that 1982-86 counting techniques differed
from earlier ones, I don't believe one can say that this collection of
counts eStablishes anything specific in a positive sense.
What do you think now?
I feel somewhat hesitant to involve you in all of this, since it
takes time.
However, I excuse myself with the thought that you were involved
already.
Sincerely yours,
Nese F.Nirhe
Henry I. Kohn
cc: Dr. Rosalie Bertell
Over
91
for Blood Count Table