RUSSELL 274 TABLE I CoMPARISON OF PRINCIPAL DosE RATES From Natural BACKGROUND AND Worip-WIDE FaLLouT Dose RATES IN MREM/YEAR? World-wide fallout from nuclear weaponstests up to 1961 Natural fraction of back- dose rate ground July 1959) UK only , External radiation to whole body: Cosmic rays From radioactive substances annual dose rate 1954-2000 total dose dohned until after AD 2000 AD 30 50 _ 4.2 _ 0.65 _ 3% 15-20 1.2 —_ — 0.2 1.5 — 0.16-0.26 0.24-0.42 _ 90% Nil Internal sources: To whole body (rangefor different tissues): Potassium 40 Carbon 14 Caesium 137 To new bone: Uranium & thorium series Strontium 90 To bone marrow (blood forming organs): Uranium & thorium series Strontium 90 — 13 8.1 — 1.6 — —_ 5 — —_ 2.7 —_ 0.81 —_ 9% 120-130 6-14 1.3 — 9% Total dose (range for different tissues) Notes: Column 1: world average from UN Report (2), p. 21. Column 2: based on Loutit e ai. (4). Columns 3 & 4: world average based on UN Report (2), p. 27. Fallout from nuclear weapons is, however, not the only source of environmental contamination; releases from nuclear reactors may also occur. In the normal operation of such establishments, iodine 131 is likely to be the most significant component released into the atmosphere. Dilute radioactive effluent containing both fission products and induced radioactive subStances is usually discharged, but at controlled levels which make it an insignificant source of exposure to the population. Accidents at nuclear re- actors may give rise to considerably higher levels of local contamination. Both past experience and theoretical studies indicate that internal and not external radiation will be the main risk to the population; iodine 131 is

Select target paragraph3