TABLE V
COSMIC RAY IONIZATION AND ULTRA LOW BACKGROUND FIELD MEASUREMENTS (yir/hr)
HASL Inferred
Location
Date
Total Gamma *
K
Natural Gamma
UT
Total
Fallout Gamms
Total
Altitude
Total Ion Chamber
Cosmic Ray
3950
5.46
5.17
(Ft. )
Dose Rate
Dose Rate **
8-9-65
-
-
-
-
-
Turquoise Lake, Colo.
8-16-65
.10
Ol
-~.1
0
~1
9
geks
10.86
10. 30
Twin Lakes, Colo.
8-17-65
.19
-02
~3
O
~.3
O
8745
9.92
9.60
Granby Res., Colo.
8-18-65
48
<.1
+.5
0
~5
0
T900
8.87
8.50
Lake Tahoe, Calif.
8-22-65
-
-
-
-
6000
6.79
6.78
Red Mountain, Calif.
8-25-65
57
6
~.1 <.1
~.2
+5
2910
5.04
4.61
Shaver Lake, Calif.
8+26-65
33
.03
~.4
~4
0
5180
6.25
5.96
Courtright Res., Calif 8-27-65
13
.03
~.3 ~.01
~.3
0
TT10
8.60
8.28
Copperopolis, Calif.
(Asbestos Mine)
8-28-65
19
.0Ol ~.2 ~90
~.2
Oo
933
4.15
3.86
Parodox Lk., N.Y.
9-1-64
7
-
-
-
-
598
4.18
3.78
Saranac Lk., N.Y.
'9-2-64
-
-
-
-
-
-
1407
LKB
4.02
9-2-64
-
-
-
-
-
-
1825
4.68
4.19
~ .06
0
0
prewar
Keyhole Res., Wyo.
Lo as
vv
hee va mk
Measurements for Determining Cosmic Ray Intensity
Elk Lk., N.Y.
Measurements at Low Background Locations
Red Mt. Mine, Calif.
Houston, Texas
8-25-65
9-6-65
.06
19
<.01 <.06
~.05
~.15
-
~.20
0
Inside Deep
Mine
"
<.1
19
0
0