4 tail T TTT 1¢? yo? o COW 6 e COW 53 ¥ COW 8 a COW 52 c COW 29 a COW 28 Ltt tuittl =z POP TTT] pc" / LITER OF MILK 10° PT Tul — 2 TTT TTT TTT TTTTT TTT Pw VW 833 | it ttt CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOIODINE TESTS 9. TST RT ADEPT LPI EL LPI ELIE TRI 2 T2122 2222222225 275227] WIZ MELLEL PLES ESET TTI 23.45 67 8 9 1011121314 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEPTEMBER 1964 Fig, 10—Milk activities in second test, For the first four to five days, the half-life in the cow is about one day. The ratios reported here are based on an “effective” number of curies consumed. That is, the grass activity per gram is multiplied by the amount consumed in grams by the average cow. These numbers are then corrected in time. One-half of the first day’s activity was used because the sampling period encompassed one whole day, during which time only one-half of the activity ingested by the cow on that day would influence the milk activity levels. Added to this were one- half of the preceding day’s activity, one-fourth of the day’s before that, etc. The net result is a composite of all the ingested activity that influences the milk activity levels. These ratios should hold true as long as the cow’s intake of radioiodine is sustained. The ratio resulting from the wet-weight data from the first test was 240 + 35, whereas the second test yielded a ratio. of 135+ 20. The reasons for this changeof ratio are being investigated. Portable-instrument Readings Scintillator readings were taken across the contaminated pasture immediately following the deposition of the radioiodine. Figure 11 shows an apparent linear relation between grass activity and scintilla- tor readings.

Select target paragraph3