AIR CLEANSING BY CONVECTIVE STORMS % oT wd -e T ! O77 7 7 10° Zz = S O —_ $ — _— _ < v 5 Oo 107! us — > o r a wen — }— 9 oc = —— a < = 10 -2 <2 3& au 40 < a 0 og 140g, — 1401, @ 1BRu,Re, — Mey @ TOTAL o 7, — Nb — | i { FHS 345 1 o fw 2 3 20 A Mice, Mace — 1445, 2 7 6 { | 2100 2130 = 7 4 L. = 4t— 8 | | bu _— | 2200 9 _ { 2230 2300 TIME, EST Fig. 7—Resulis of rainwater analyses and rainfall-rate data for Sept. 30, 1961. September 30 rain samples. In the May 19 rain, the pollens appear to have been progressively washed out except for the upward tendencies of samples 4P and 6P, The radioactive materials, on the other hand, show peculiar tendencies in both cases, More detailed discussion of these peculiarities is presented later, but it should be noted here that there is a strong likelihood that tropospheric (intermediate) radioactive debris was present in both cases, Necessarily, a low frequency of sampling is associated with low-intensity rainfall; however, in both of these situations, samples were taken continuously throughout the rains, Summary The two classes of convective rain-producing situations that we have distinguished have a number of contrasting characteristics. Al- though the sample size is extremely small (because ofthis, it will probably be necessary to revise the classification criteria as more data become available), the distinctive characteristics are brought together in Table l.

Select target paragraph3