138 LOYSEN Several balloon flights were made during which particle size samples were collected. The sampler used in the last three flights of the series embodied improvements based on experience in the earlier flights; therefore measurements of samples from these last flights were used for most of the data reported here. The flight series is identified in Table 1. The relatively few measurements from flights 2556, 2562, 2569, and 2572 were consolidated. Table 1— FLIGHT TEST DESIGNATION Flight No. Date Location Altitude, ft 2956 2962 2569 2572 2611 T-781-A T-796-A August 1961 September 1961 October 1961 October 1961 October 1962 May 1963 June 1963 Minneapolis, Minn. Minneapolis, Minn. Minneapolis, Minn. Minneapolis, Minn. Minneapolis, Minn. San Angelo, Tex. San Angelo, Tex. 106,000 115,000 109,000 109,006 108,000 106,000 106,000 METHOD OF COUNTING AND SIZING PARTICLES The grids were examined at HASL in an electron microscope. Approximately 150 fields were photographed at magnifications ranging from 300 to 190,000x, depending on the size of the particles. Photographic enlargements were made from the film plates, generally to an 8- by 10-in. size. This resulted in overall magnifications of 1200 to 764,000 x. In all cases particles were sized by equal-area techniques by using either a series of transparent overlays or a Zeiss automatic particle counter. Size groups were established in a geometric progression, and particles were classified in each group. RESULTS The size-distribution results for the seven tests are presented in Table 2, and graphical representations are given in Figs. 3 to 6. Photomicrographs of several types of particles collected by the sampler are included as Figs. 7 to 14. Upon examination of the figures, the median diameters can be estimated to range from 0.002 to 0.13 yp as shown in Table 3. The differences in median size among the four test groups may be explained by the fact that a large number of particles in some size ranges were counted from a single or a few photographs. This caused the distribution to be biased. Correlation of the differences in the size distributions with the occurrence of weapons tests, the radioactivity

Select target paragraph3