#118 - 12
the table who is presumably seeing the other side of the
coin and not your side, you have to remember that on our
side are dozens and dozens of countries involved. I think
that we have done a very fine job to get the NATO countries
and ourselves all in one packet, agreeing to one thing,
and get that done.
Now, on the other side, you will recall there are many
bases out in the Red China area.
Those were not brought
in as merely at this point being complicating and not
being critical to the first steps that we are talking about,
which is the creating of confidence and all that sort of
thing.
You know, one of the early reasons I explained at the time
in the International Atomic Energy thing, if we can get
people used to working together over a peaceful thing where
they have got to solve problems of administration and dir-
ection and all sorts of technical problems of an engineering nature, maybe we can build up some kind of confidence,
instead of having people necessarily always standing,
paperallys with daggers in their eyes, watching the other
ellow.
Q.
Cater, Reporter Magazine.
Mr. President, a number
of competent legal authorities since the passage of this
Jury Trial Amendment have said that this specific amendment is workable, that there are still teeth, that under
civil contempt procedures that you could go quite a dis-
tance with a District Judge and the Attorney General, or
the Justice Department. So far as I know, no one has
addressed any rebuttal to the merits of this particular
amendment as passed.
Do you know what it is that specifically disturbs you a-
bout the final amendment‘
THE PRESIDENT:
Well, I think again I must refer you to
my statement of August 2nd, written out very carefully.
But there is, there are implications in Section 4 as now
written that in my opinion would be most damaging to the
entire Federal Judiciary.
REPRODUCED AT THE DWIGHT D.
EISENHOWER LIBRARY
Qe
Warren Unna, Washington Post.
Mr. President, in
your discussion of the clean bomb --THE PRESIDENT:
What's that*’
Q.
(Unna).
In your discussion of the clean bomb, you
mentioned a 95 percent clean bomb, and hopes for developing an absolutely clean bomb.
a
3
j
enty
a