et yt ne eae. A,myfas Bias, Sdoo 37 The OR denoted the individual tissues, excretions, or physiological processes involved in the preferential utilization of calcium over strontium, and when less than 1, expresses such a preference. rats on a canmercial diet was 0.27. causing the discrimination. For example, the Qbpone-diet for The OR did not imply action by the tissue Instead, to denote the phystological process of discriminat fon in a given tissue, the authors utflized the term “StrontiumCalcium Discrimination Factor" (OF). The product of the DFs equalled the OR. That strontium was preferentially discriminated against by the placenta | I was found in beagle dogs (AEC Project No. 6, 1958). ' The ORfetal bone-diet was 0,3], based upon data from two pups, a value somewhat Jower than the ORadult bone-diet of 0.4-0.5 of mature beagles (Della Rosa et al., 1972). The metabolic studies of radiostrontium intensified when its potential toxicity as a conponent of radioactive fallout was recognized and studies on its effects began. The radiobiologfcal significance of strontium metabolism was discussed in reviews (Thompson, 1960; Loutit, 1962; ICRP, 1972) and symposia (Lenihan et a}., 1967; Goldman and Bustad, 1972). Radiobjological Effects The tumorigenic ability of radiostrontium was recognized jn the 1940s. Strontium-89 was descrihed as a “producer par excellence of bone tumors” by Brues et al. (1947), who reported that tumor development tn over 3000 mice was approximately proportional to dose and to time, with a latent period that itself was related inversely to dose. Such a scheme was shown to fit data that were available for human radtun dtfal painters. Besides bone turors, aplastic anenia and myeloid metaplasia were canmon at necropsy (Brues et al., 1949),

Select target paragraph3