N
irrigation and in some cases, even movable sprinklers, but in many of the
cases they were just natural meadows.
The next slide (JK-22).
Now here is the data base.
Here are some of
_the characteristics of the data base as it resides in the Livermore computer,
and
we
have
the
identification,
the
location
characteristics
and
designation, the rainfall as received from Vern and the habitat and site
description, and the second value from the bottom there should really be in
cpm of ces iumbecause the areal inventory value there is really not valid
until
we
correct
the
depth
distribution
function.
These
are
depth
10
distribution.So7that's essentially where the data base stands today.
ll
think Howard's going-to discuss what followed after our measurements.
12
were the middle team.
13
group.
I
We
—
Thefirst was Frosty's, and the second team was our
’
:
ae
_
14
CHAIRMAN MOSELEY: Are there any questions?
15
DR. AUXIER:
John, I wasJust wondering.
That photograph (JK-6) which
16
shows the angular distribution calibration detector in the Lab, that was a
17
setup,
18
calibration in the Lab like that, did you?
I
presume,
19
DR. KORANDA:
20
DR. AUXIER:
just for
the ‘photograph?
We sure did.
You
didn't
really do
the
=
Well, how did you take account of the fact that as you go_
21
around the arc, that the 5 ratio for albedo would vary so markedly with
22
angle?
7
23
DR. KORANDA:
I don't use albedo in that context.
24
DR. AUXIER:
Well,
to
say
it differently,just -say that
the
room
25
return will vary markedly from -- for instance at the bottom of the arc the
26
source is getting scattering back from the floor much moremarkedly than it
would be over at the 900 angle or 70° angle.
28
DR. KORANDA:
I don't think I can deduce that.
87
Oo you have any ideas