actual mother from the external?
DR. ANSPAUGH:
Not to the actual mother.
MR. HENDERSON:
Am I wrong on that, Dick?
Richard Henderson from Los Alamos.
As you pointed
out, we had no information regarding the actual mother, and we picked -since we are not as closely tied to location, we took a lifestyle that was
descr ibed by one of the litigants as being typical of a mother at that time —
and used that kind of information, what her habits were as far as being
inside and outside the house.
We did use the house that was described by
the litigant...Wé-did not go back and say that was the litigant's mother,
10
per se.
We also have a surrogate.
ll
OR. McCLELLAN: —T- was wondering in terms of on the cascade impactor
12
data, roughly how many of those data sets do you have that you have worked
13
through already, and how-many- are_potentially available?
14
DR. ANSPAUGH:
Well, I realtycan't give you a hard number, but on the
15
Operations TUMBLER/SNAPPER, UPSHOT/KNOTHOLE, and TEAPOT, there are probably
16
as many of those measurements as there are high volume samplers.
17
estimate there is something like 10-12 locations that actually had these
18
cascade impactors per event for those series.
19
20
21
DR. McCLELLAN:
Were they deployed with “@cRigh vol at the same site in
each case?
. ~
DR. ANSPAUGH:
impactor,
23
comparisons between the two data.
- 25
there was
I think in almost all cases if there was a cascade
22
24
I would
DR. McCLELLAN:
a
high
volume
sampler,
and
I
have
presented
some
They track surprisingly well.
What further have you done on--thatfront in terms
of --
2
26
OR. ANSPAUGH: How well they track?
27
DOR. MCCLELLAN:
28
DR. ANSPAUGH:
|
—
Yes, have you done any further -I
haven't
done
47
anything
more
than
what
I
have.