DR. CAROTHERS:
MR. NUTLEY:
Is there a reason for that?
The decision was made before Mr. Warriner came on board
that we had to be able to recover each individual document on its own merit
rather than a group of documents of similar subject matter.
| “OR. CAROTHERS:
Is that directive or decision arguable?
=“MB:NUTLEY: Certainly.
ok,taROTHERS:
|
Because if it is not, then I submit that there is no
point in furtier,discussion.
MR. uTLey:“We can discuss anything that needs to be discussed.
OR. CAROTHERS! - I know, but I do not wish to discuss something which
10
11
leads to no possitile—act ion, however.
12
wish to do it here. (Layghter)
I do that at home a lot.
I don't
13
MR. NUTLEY:
14
DR. CAROTHERS: No, but thé-paint I'm making is that if it is in some
15
form of an order. from somebodythat we must follow regardless, why then so
16
be it.
17
sir.
Is yourwite related to mine?
It's just a point that might-be. investigated by this subcommittee,
,
a =~
18
CHAIRMAN MOSELEY:
19
OR. MC CLELLAN: . Let me try to be as suecinct as I can.
Yes.
What I would
20
like to see -- my concern is that we don't -have enough information at hand
21
to really grapple with the CIC.
22
what are the absolute norms in terms of documents. thatare in hand today be
23
it perhaps categorized by three value ranges.
24
the public who spoke would agree that it would be—appropriate to input
25
certain resources.
I would like -to see laid out before us
I think even the member of
If you can't do them all tomorrow, instantaneously, you
26 ‘have to have some decision basis to which you will do first.
But if we had
27
that as a given there, we had the information in hand in terms of how many
28
have been keyworded, how many have not; what jis the average amount of time
301