importance of it to the general public.
These records, I think, should be
viewed
only
as
officials,
exceedingly
useful
to
individual citizens,
not
scientists
but
to
and their legal representatives.
public
I would
suggest that we are on the side of gathering more rather than
information within
reasonable
limits,
and,
less
specifically speaking to the
issue of the trial information, that I find that -- or, I believe we will
find that to be very useful,
and so will
people in the future,
and
it
appears to be important enough for CIC purposes.
On the dose reconstruction and soil sampling, I was just very pleased
10
to see the intensity of the work in that area and the output of the staff.
ll
Since the very beginning, I think that has been a key issue with represen-
12
tatives from Utah,
13
accuracy of the airborne readings just begins to bring that out further,
14
the importance of having this reconstruction especially in areas that did
15
not have ground monitoring during the fallout.
16
should be commended in this area, and that we should continue to emphasize
17
work in this area with both our own interest and resources for these under-
18
takings.
Arizona,
and Nevada,
and
I believe that the lack of
I think that the staff
I think of one other issue and that is a final report.
19
20
putting
21
presentations, and I think it is appropriate for us at the next meeting as
22
an advisory group to begin to outline what we believe
23
analysis of the effort and begin to assign people on this advisory group
24
with
25
think that will rol] around very quickly in a year and-a-half.
26
kind of intensity of effort that's being shown in all of these areas,
27
will be just around the corner.
28
up
his
concern
for
some
of
some responsibilities for final
CHAIRMAN MOSELEY:
the
committees,
I saw Bruce
publication
publications,
and
should be our
information,
because
I
With the
it
May I make a comment in connection with that last
286